Why Nations Fail?

Couple of months ago, I picked up a fantastic book: ” Why Nations Fail” by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson.  As I’m a newbie in the field of international development and aid industry, the debate around the book was absolutely delightful.
I highly recommend reading the book, if only, because of the debate around the origins of development.

Why Nations Fail completely dismisses different theories of why development is successful or not, like the idea of culture or geography. Therefore, throughout the book, the authors make a strong case that institutions matter, more than anything else. Personally, I appreciated the consistency of the book, Acemogly and Robinson kept emphasizing broad terms like inclusive versus extractive institutions, which gets embodied into your brain and you come to accept their theory. Now, it is always good to take everything with a grain of salt, because at the end of the day, institutions are not a definite mark of why nations fail. Nonetheless, I enjoyed discovering a new layer of reasoning and a different approach in explaining development. I’ve tried to compile a list of some interesting articles regarding the debate around the book, ultimately trying to learn more about this controversy:

I know I’m late to the debate, but I really enjoyed spending hours absorbing all these information. At the end of the day, it helped to remember that there is no black and white in international development.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s